A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing Diagnostic Clinical Prediction Rules with Clinical Judgment
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Systematic Review of Studies Comparing Diagnostic Clinical Prediction Rules with Clinical Judgment
BACKGROUND Diagnostic clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are developed to improve diagnosis or decrease diagnostic testing. Whether, and in what situations diagnostic CPRs improve upon clinical judgment is unclear. METHODS AND FINDINGS We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL, with supplementary citation and reference checking for studies comparing CPRs and clinical judgment against a current obj...
متن کاملSystematic review of the effects of care provided with and without diagnostic clinical prediction rules
Background: Diagnostic clinical prediction rules (CPRs) are worthwhile if they improve patient outcomes or provide benefits such as reduced resource use, without harming patients. We conducted a systematic review to assess the effects of diagnostic CPRs on patient and process of care outcomes. Methods: We searched electronic databases and a trial registry and performed citation and reference ch...
متن کاملImpact analysis studies of clinical prediction rules relevant to primary care: a systematic review
OBJECTIVES Following appropriate validation, clinical prediction rules (CPRs) should undergo impact analysis to evaluate their effect on patient care. The aim of this systematic review is to narratively review and critically appraise CPR impact analysis studies relevant to primary care. SETTING Primary care. PARTICIPANTS Adults and children. INTERVENTION Studies that implemented the CPR c...
متن کاملThe effects of periodontal treatment on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review of clinical trial studies
Background and Aim: Most recent systematic studies have reported on the role of periodontal disease in adverse pregnancy outcomes, which has paved the way for interventional studies in recent years; However, due to the limited number of clinical trial studies, the results of these studies have not yet been collected in a systematic study; Therefore, the aim of present study was to evaluate the...
متن کاملThe risk of bleeding with warfarin: a systematic review and performance analysis of clinical prediction rules.
It was the objective of this article to qualitatively review and evaluate the clinical prediction rules (CPRs) available for estimating bleeding risk in patients commencing warfarin therapy. A systematic review of PubMed (1949 to December 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2006); EMBASE (1980 to December 2006), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (to December 2006), and International Pharmace...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PLOS ONE
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128233